<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opera&#8217;s Built-In Features vs. Firefox&#8217;s Equivalent Extensions</title>
	<link>http://liveslick.com/2007/09/13/operas-built-in-features-vs-firefoxs-equivalent-extensions/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: nomad</title>
		<link>http://liveslick.com/2007/09/13/operas-built-in-features-vs-firefoxs-equivalent-extensions/#comment-883</link>
		<dc:creator>nomad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liveslick.com/2007/09/13/operas-built-in-features-vs-firefoxs-equivalent-extensions/#comment-883</guid>
		<description>Opera sucks it's way behind the times.  Firefox has so much feature to it with the addons I can duplicate everything Opera has and more with Firefox.  Firefox is faster too and outperforms Opera.

Switched from Opera 10 to Firefox and haven't looked back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opera sucks it&#8217;s way behind the times.  Firefox has so much feature to it with the addons I can duplicate everything Opera has and more with Firefox.  Firefox is faster too and outperforms Opera.</p>
<p>Switched from Opera 10 to Firefox and haven&#8217;t looked back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harpmaker</title>
		<link>http://liveslick.com/2007/09/13/operas-built-in-features-vs-firefoxs-equivalent-extensions/#comment-870</link>
		<dc:creator>Harpmaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 16:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liveslick.com/2007/09/13/operas-built-in-features-vs-firefoxs-equivalent-extensions/#comment-870</guid>
		<description>As a long-time Opera user I have found version 10 to almost be a different browser due to the huge change in layout. I dislike it so much that I have moved to using Firefox 3.6x and I doubt I will be using Opera much in the future. 

This page has been a GREAT help to me since many of the features I relied on in Opera are available in FF with add-on's.

On a sad note, it seems that the 'Formfiller' add-on has been abandoned by it's creator and won't work in current versions of FF. I haven't found a replacement for it yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a long-time Opera user I have found version 10 to almost be a different browser due to the huge change in layout. I dislike it so much that I have moved to using Firefox 3.6x and I doubt I will be using Opera much in the future. </p>
<p>This page has been a GREAT help to me since many of the features I relied on in Opera are available in FF with add-on&#8217;s.</p>
<p>On a sad note, it seems that the &#8216;Formfiller&#8217; add-on has been abandoned by it&#8217;s creator and won&#8217;t work in current versions of FF. I haven&#8217;t found a replacement for it yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://liveslick.com/2007/09/13/operas-built-in-features-vs-firefoxs-equivalent-extensions/#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 21:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liveslick.com/2007/09/13/operas-built-in-features-vs-firefoxs-equivalent-extensions/#comment-864</guid>
		<description>..just those good features are hidden behind obscure settings, just compare simple Greasemonkey installation with opera analogue:
http://my.opera.com/c69/blog/tutorial-how-to-enable-user-javascript-in-opera</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>..just those good features are hidden behind obscure settings, just compare simple Greasemonkey installation with opera analogue:<br />
<a href="http://my.opera.com/c69/blog/tutorial-how-to-enable-user-javascript-in-opera" rel="nofollow">http://my.opera.com/c69/blog/tutorial-how-to-enable-user-javascript-in-opera</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get Firefox to work like Opera&#160;&#124;&#160;Guthardt Blog</title>
		<link>http://liveslick.com/2007/09/13/operas-built-in-features-vs-firefoxs-equivalent-extensions/#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator>Get Firefox to work like Opera&#160;&#124;&#160;Guthardt Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liveslick.com/2007/09/13/operas-built-in-features-vs-firefoxs-equivalent-extensions/#comment-835</guid>
		<description>[...] I immediately miss many of Opera&#8217;s  features. But there are add-ons! You can find many blog posts out there with lists of add-ons that are supposed to make Firefox work like Opera &#8211; they were [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I immediately miss many of Opera&#8217;s  features. But there are add-ons! You can find many blog posts out there with lists of add-ons that are supposed to make Firefox work like Opera &#8211; they were [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: belask</title>
		<link>http://liveslick.com/2007/09/13/operas-built-in-features-vs-firefoxs-equivalent-extensions/#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>belask</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 01:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liveslick.com/2007/09/13/operas-built-in-features-vs-firefoxs-equivalent-extensions/#comment-769</guid>
		<description>Opera is the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opera is the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyrus</title>
		<link>http://liveslick.com/2007/09/13/operas-built-in-features-vs-firefoxs-equivalent-extensions/#comment-698</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyrus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 06:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liveslick.com/2007/09/13/operas-built-in-features-vs-firefoxs-equivalent-extensions/#comment-698</guid>
		<description>Good article, I will now try mouse gestures, all-in-one sidebar and the Scrapbook add-ons in Firefox.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article, I will now try mouse gestures, all-in-one sidebar and the Scrapbook add-ons in Firefox.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://liveslick.com/2007/09/13/operas-built-in-features-vs-firefoxs-equivalent-extensions/#comment-628</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 03:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liveslick.com/2007/09/13/operas-built-in-features-vs-firefoxs-equivalent-extensions/#comment-628</guid>
		<description>I have my pc hooked to my tv and I have found the Fit to Width option in Opera very useful when surfing the net on my tv (and watching online videos and such). I have been looking for an add-on for Firefox with this same functionality but have been unsuccessful. Anyone know of a plug-in like this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have my pc hooked to my tv and I have found the Fit to Width option in Opera very useful when surfing the net on my tv (and watching online videos and such). I have been looking for an add-on for Firefox with this same functionality but have been unsuccessful. Anyone know of a plug-in like this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pepi</title>
		<link>http://liveslick.com/2007/09/13/operas-built-in-features-vs-firefoxs-equivalent-extensions/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>Pepi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liveslick.com/2007/09/13/operas-built-in-features-vs-firefoxs-equivalent-extensions/#comment-453</guid>
		<description>One difference for point 2.. in Opera you can have the script load before or after page load.. (giving you the opportunity to overload page functions..) while in GreaseMonkey the script is always loaded afterwards..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One difference for point 2.. in Opera you can have the script load before or after page load.. (giving you the opportunity to overload page functions..) while in GreaseMonkey the script is always loaded afterwards..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://liveslick.com/2007/09/13/operas-built-in-features-vs-firefoxs-equivalent-extensions/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 13:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liveslick.com/2007/09/13/operas-built-in-features-vs-firefoxs-equivalent-extensions/#comment-150</guid>
		<description>Ian check out FEBE, I understand the pains of trying to backup firefox and is a plus for opera, I might get round to trying it again, but i like the way I have my firefox setup.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;With FEBE you can backup an entire profile or single extensions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian check out FEBE, I understand the pains of trying to backup firefox and is a plus for opera, I might get round to trying it again, but i like the way I have my firefox setup.</p>
<p>With FEBE you can backup an entire profile or single extensions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Admin</title>
		<link>http://liveslick.com/2007/09/13/operas-built-in-features-vs-firefoxs-equivalent-extensions/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 11:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://liveslick.com/2007/09/13/operas-built-in-features-vs-firefoxs-equivalent-extensions/#comment-133</guid>
		<description>Ian - yea, Firefox (and Thunderbird) are annoying if you want to transfer files from one installation to the next. Makes reformatting a pain. You can copy the whole %appdata% folder of Firefox to make it a similar installation.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Engtech - can you please explain what's wrong with this in firefox? It's working fine here. Maybe NoScript is blocking something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian - yea, Firefox (and Thunderbird) are annoying if you want to transfer files from one installation to the next. Makes reformatting a pain. You can copy the whole %appdata% folder of Firefox to make it a similar installation.</p>
<p>Engtech - can you please explain what&#8217;s wrong with this in firefox? It&#8217;s working fine here. Maybe NoScript is blocking something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

